By 
                  Liz Highleyman
                  
                   Standard 
                  treatment for chronic hepatitis 
                  C using pegylated interferon (Pegasys 
                  or PegIntron) plus ribavirin produces sustained 
                  response -- considered to be a cure -- about half the time, 
                  with HCV genotypes 2 
                  and 3 (treated for 24 week) showing better response rates 
                  than hard-to-treat genotypes 
                  1 or 4 (treated for 48 weeks).
Standard 
                  treatment for chronic hepatitis 
                  C using pegylated interferon (Pegasys 
                  or PegIntron) plus ribavirin produces sustained 
                  response -- considered to be a cure -- about half the time, 
                  with HCV genotypes 2 
                  and 3 (treated for 24 week) showing better response rates 
                  than hard-to-treat genotypes 
                  1 or 4 (treated for 48 weeks). 
                  
                  Treatment is expensive and can cause difficult side effects, 
                  however, so it is useful to have an early indicator to enable 
                  patients to stop treatment that likely will not turn out to 
                  be successful.
                  
                  F. Fred Poordad from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles 
                  and colleagues collected data from previous published clinical 
                  trial reports in order to evaluate the predictive value of RVR 
                  as an indicator of SVR and viral relapse. 
                  
                  Results
                
                   
                    |  | Data 
                      supported a 24-week regimen for HCV genotype 1 patients 
                      who achieved RVR. | 
                   
                    |  | The 
                      positive predictive value -- or how often RVR accurately 
                      predicted SVR -- was 77.8% for patients treated for 24 weeks 
                      versus 85.7% for those treated for 48 weeks, not a significant 
                      difference. | 
                   
                    |  | However, 
                      lack of RVR among genotype 1 patients "should not be 
                      viewed as a criterion for extending treatment duration beyond 
                      48 weeks." | 
                   
                    |  | Negative 
                      predictive values -- or how often lack of RVR predicted 
                      failure to achieve SVR -- were 60.9% for genotype 1 patients 
                      treated for 48 weeks and 52.7% for those treated for 72 
                      weeks, not a significant improvement with longer therapy. | 
                   
                    |  | Among 
                      people with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, RVR also had a high positive 
                      predictive value. | 
                   
                    |  | Negative 
                      predictive value, however, varied according to treatment 
                      duration, indicating that a 24-week regimen is warranted 
                      for genotype 2 or 3 patients who did not achieve RVR. | 
                
                Based 
                  on these findings, the study authors concluded, "The present 
                  analysis confirms RVR as a strong predictor of SVR that can 
                  be used to tailor treatment duration, but which also should 
                  be appreciated in the context of treatment duration and regimen."
                  
                  Investigator affiliation: Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, 
                  Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
                  
                  9/3/10
                Reference
                  FF 
                  Poordad. Review article: the role of rapid virological response 
                  in determining treatment duration for chronic hepatitis C. Alimentary 
                  Pharmacology and Therapeutics 31(12): 1251-1267 (Abstract). 
                  June 2010.