Abacavir 
        (Ziagen) Does Not Compromise Effectiveness of Hepatitis C Treatment, but 
        Zidovudine (Retrovir) May Reduce Response
        
        
          
           
            |  |  |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  | 
                 
                  | SUMMARY: 
                    Using a nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor 
                    (NRTI) backbone containing abacavir 
                    (Ziagen, also in the Epzicom 
                    coformulation) was not associated with poorer response to 
                    interferon-based therapy for hepatitis C in HIV/HCV coinfected 
                    patients, researchers reported at the 17th Conference on Retroviruses 
                    and Opportunistic Infections (CROI 
                    2010) last month in San Francisco. However, backbones 
                    containing zidovudine 
                    (AZT; Retrovir) and possibly didanosine 
                    (ddI; Videx) were associated with a lower likelihood of 
                    achieving a sustained response. |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  |  |  |  | 
        
        By 
          Liz Highleyman
        
        The effect 
          of accompanying antiretroviral 
          drugs on virological response to hepatitis C therapy using interferon 
          plus ribavirin remains uncertain, given that prior studies have 
          produced conflicting results. Like ribavirin, zidovudine can cause anemia, 
          which may increase the risk of ribavirin dose reduction and premature 
          discontinuation. Some studies have suggested that abacavir 
          might be linked to poorer response, but data 
          have not been consistent.
          
          To further explore this issue, Juan Berenguer and colleagues evaluated 
          the effect of antiretroviral drugs, particularly abacavir, on response 
          to pegylated interferon 
          plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV coinfected patients.
          
          The investigators conducted a retrospective pooled analysis of 2 cohorts 
          of HIV/HCV coinfected patients starting hepatitis C treatment: GESIDA 
          3603 (enrolled between January 2000 and July 2007 at 20 centers in Spain) 
          and GESIDA 5006 (enrolled between January 2003 and June 2005 at 36 centers). 
          In GESIDA 5006, the main objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy 
          of interferon-based therapy in coinfected patients taking ART that included 
          tenofovir vs other NRTIs.
          
          The analysis included a total of 1701 coinfected patients. Most (75%) 
          were men and the median age was 41 years. A majority (63%) had hard-to-treat 
          HCV genotypes 1 or 4, two-thirds had high HCV viral load, and 27% had 
          advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Most (88%) were on ART, 74% had HIV 
          viral load < 50 copies/mL, and the median baseline CD4 cell count 
          was high, at 514 cells/mm3.
          
          About 60% were treated with pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Pegasys) and 
          40% received pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PegIntron), both with ribavirin 
          (typically weight-adjusted). The study outcome measure was sustained 
          virological response (SVR), or undetectable HCV viral load 24 weeks 
          after completion of treatment.
          
          Results
        
           
            |  | The 
              overall SVR rate was 38%: | 
           
            | 
                 
                  |  | 25% for genotypes 1 and 4; |   
                  |  | 61% 
                    for genotypes 2 and 3. |  | 
           
            |  | In 
              a multiple logistic regression analysis, the following factors were 
              independently associated with increased odds of sustained response: | 
          
            | 
                 
                  |  | HCV 
                    genotype 2 or 3 (adjusted odd ratio [OR] 5.31); |   
                  |  | Absence 
                    of AIDS-defining conditions (adjusted OR 1.75); |   
                  |  | Baseline 
                    HVC RNA < 500,000 IU/mL (adjusted OR 1.73). |  | 
           
            |  | 44% 
              of participants receiving any ART achieved SVR, compared with 37% 
              of those not on any ART (not a significant difference). | 
           
            |  | Looking 
              at NRTI backbones yielded the following SVR rates: | 
           
            |  | 
                 
                  |  | Tenofovir 
                    + lamivudine 
                    (3TC; Epivir) or emtricitabine 
                    (Emtriva): 42% (21% for genotypes 1 or 4 only); |   
                  |  | Lamivudine 
                    + stavudine (d4T; Zerit): 39% (19%); |   
                  |  | Abacavir 
                    + lamivudine (without zidovudine): 37% (26%); |   
                  |  | Zidovudine 
                    + lamivudine (all): 35% (19%); |   
                  |  | Zidovudine 
                    + lamivudine (without abacavir): 36% (18%); |   
                  |  | Zidovudine 
                    + lamivudine (with abacavir): 33% (19%); |   
                  |  | Didanosine 
                    + lamivudine or emtricitabine: 25% (17%); |   
                  |  | Didanosine 
                    + stavudine: 21% (10%). |  | 
           
            |  | Regimens containing zidovudine (all and without abacavir) were significantly 
              less effective than regimens containing tenofovir. | 
           
            |  | Otherwise, 
              the effect of other NRTI backbones had little effect on SVR. | 
           
            |  | Response 
              rates were lower with didanosine backbones, but few patients used 
              such regimens and the differences did not reach statistical significance. | 
           
            |  | No 
              significant differences were found between the different backbones 
              when repeating the analysis for patients receiving < 800 mg/kg 
              ribavirin or less than the median or first quartile ribavirin doses. | 
           
            |  | Likewise, 
              no significant differences were found between the backbones when 
              analyzing subgroup of patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4, or those 
              with HCV RNA > 500,000 IU/mL. | 
           
            |  | Also, 
              no significant differences were found according to whether the NRTI 
              backbone was accompanied by a NNRTI or a boosted or unboosted protease 
              inhibitor. | 
        
        Based 
          on these findings, the investigators concluded, "Our results suggest 
          that, with the exception of regimens including [zidovudine], accompanying 
          antiretroviral drugs have little effect on virologic response to [pegylated 
          interferon] plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV patients."
        "We 
          did not find abacavir to negatively impact the outcome of [pegylated 
          interferon] plus ribavirin therapy even in difficult-to-treat patients 
          such as those with genotypes 1 and 4 and high HCV RNA," they added.
        Hosp 
          Gen Univ Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain; Hosp Donostia, 
          Spain; Hosp Ramon y Cajal, Spain; Hosp Clin, Barcelona, Spain; Hosp 
          Univ La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hosp Univ La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Hosp Principe 
          de Asturias, Spain.
        3/2/10
        Reference
          J 
          Berenguer, M von Wichmann, C Quereda, and others. Effect of Accompanying 
          Antiretroviral Drugs on Virologic Response to PEG-IFN and Ribavirin 
          in HIV/HCV-Co-infected Patients. 17th Conference on Retroviruses & 
          Opportunistic Infections (CROI 2010). San Francisco. February 16-19, 
          2010. (Abstract 
          663).