Pegylated 
        Interferon Lambda for Hepatitis C Produces Good Response with Minimal 
        Blood Toxicity
        
        
          
           
            |  |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  | 
                 
                  | SUMMARY: 
                    Pegylated interferon lambda and pegyalted interferon alfa-2a 
                    demonstrated similar activity against hepatitis C virus (HCV) 
                    for genotype 2 or 3 patients at week 12, and somewhat better 
                    early response rates at higher doses in people with genotypes 
                    1 or 4, according to a study presented at the recent American 
                    Association for the Study of Liver Diseases "Liver Meeting" 
                    (AASLD 2010) in Boston. Furthermore, 
                    interferon lambda was better tolerated overall, with fewer 
                    cases of anemia and less neutrophil loss. |  |  | 
           
            |  |  |  |  | 
        
        By 
          Liz Highleyman
          
           Interferon 
          lambda (also known as interleukin 29, or IL-29) is a cytokine produced 
          by certain immune system cells in response to viral infection. It uses 
          a different signalling pathway that type I interferons such as interferon 
          alfa -- the standard treatment for hepatitis 
          C. Because interferon lambda uses a receptor that is present on 
          fewer types of cells in the body, it is expected to have better tolerability 
          and cause fewer side effects.
Interferon 
          lambda (also known as interleukin 29, or IL-29) is a cytokine produced 
          by certain immune system cells in response to viral infection. It uses 
          a different signalling pathway that type I interferons such as interferon 
          alfa -- the standard treatment for hepatitis 
          C. Because interferon lambda uses a receptor that is present on 
          fewer types of cells in the body, it is expected to have better tolerability 
          and cause fewer side effects.
        Andrew Muir 
          from Duke University and colleagues conducted a Phase 2 dose-ranging 
          study comparing pegylated 
          interferon lambda versus pegylated 
          interferon alfa as part of combination therapy.
        The study 
          included 55 previously untreated chronic hepatitis C patients. They 
          were randomly assigned to receive pegylated interferon lambda at doses 
          of 80, 120, 180, or 240 mcg, or else 180 mcg pegylated interferon alfa-2a 
          (Pegasys), both in combination with ribavirin. Participants initially 
          received a single dose to assess pharmacokinetic parameters, and then 
          after 2 weeks started weekly dosing that continued for 24 weeks for 
          those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, or 48 weeks for those with hard-to-treat 
          genotypes 1 or 4.
        The investigators 
          analyzed safety data through week 12 or the last study visit (for patients 
          who had not yet reached that point) or discontinuation of treatment. 
          Week 12 efficacy data for HCV genotype 2 or 3 patients were reported 
          in the study abstract, while those with genotypes 1 or 4 had not yet 
          reached this time point. 
        The researchers 
          also looked at the effect of rs12897986 polymorphisms, or genetic variations, 
          in the human IL28B gene, which encodes a form of interferon lambda. 
          People with the C/C gene pattern have been shown 
          to respond better to interferon alfa, those with the T/T pattern 
          respond poorly, and those with C/T fall in between. Here, the distribution 
          (among 48 patients tested) was 15 with C/C and 33 with C/T or T/T (considered 
          as a single group).
        Results
        
           
            |  | In an intent-to-treat analysis of genotype 2 and 3 patients, virological 
              response rates were similar in the 3 highest interferon lambda dose 
              groups and the interferon alfa arm: | 
           
            |  | 
                 
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 80 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 40%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 60%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          12: 80%. |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 120 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 75%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 100%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          12: 100%. |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 180 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 60%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 80%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          12: 80%. |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 240 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 75%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 100%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          12: 100%. |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    alfa 180 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 80%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 100%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          12: 100%. |  |  | 
           
            |  | In an analysis of genotype 1 and 4 patients (who had not been treated 
              as long at the time of the report), early response appeared slightly 
              better in the higher interferon lambda dose groups: | 
           
            |  | 
                 
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 80 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 0%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 0%; |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 120 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 29%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 43%; |  |   
                  |  | Interferon lambda 180 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 33%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 33%; |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    lambda 240 mcg: |   
                  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 29%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 43%; |  |   
                  |  | Interferon 
                    alfa 180 mcg: |   
                  |  | 
                       
                        | - | Week 
                          2: 20%; |   
                        | - | Week 
                          4: 40%; |  |  | 
           
            |  | Overall, 
              white patients had higher response rates than blacks (only 1 black 
              participant achieved viral suppression at weeks 2 and 4). 
 | 
           
            |  | Looking 
              at the 3 highest interferon lambda dose arms combined, the virological 
              response rates for genotype 1 or 4 patients with the C/C gene pattern 
              was 71% at both week 2 and week 4. | 
           
            |  | For 
              genotype 1 or 4 patients with the C/T or T/T patterns, the corresponding 
              response rates were 8% at week 2, rising to 25% by week 4. | 
           
            |  | 11 
              participants discontinued therapy ahead of schedule, 4 of them due 
              to adverse events (1 in the interferon lambda and 1 in the interferon 
              alfa arms). | 
           
            |  | 33% 
              of patients in the interferon lambda arm experienced clinical adverse 
              events of grade 2 (moderate) or higher, compared with 50% of those 
              taking interferon alfa. | 
           
            |  | The 
              frequency of grade 2 anemia (hemoglobin ? 10 g/dL) was 10-fold lower 
              in the interferon lambda arm than in the interferon alfa -- 2% vs 
              20%, respectively. | 
           
            |  | Interferon 
              lambda recipients were less likely to require ribavirin dose reduction 
              due to anemia. | 
           
            |  | The 
              median decline in neutrophils (immune white blood cells that protect 
              against infections) was 0.86 x 109/L for interferon lambda recipients 
              versus 2.4 x 109/L in the interferon alfa arm. | 
           
            |  | Both 
              arms experience ALT/AST liver enzyme increases (20% vs 30% of participants, 
              respectively, in the interferon lambda and interferon alfa arms). | 
           
            |  | 3 
              patients receiving interferon lambda (7%) reduced doses due to ALT/AST 
              elevation, while 1 interferon alfa recipient did so due to depression. | 
           
            |  | Among 
              interferon lambda recipients, adverse events did not vary according 
              to dose. | 
        
        Based on 
          these findings, the researchers concluded, "[Pegyalted interferon 
          lambda] is associated with rapid viral decline and is well-tolerated 
          at doses up to 240 mcg, with less hematologic toxicity compared to [pegyalted 
          interferon alfa-2a]." 
        Response 
          was influenced by race, HCV genotype, and patient gene pattern, they 
          continued. "[Pegyalted interferon lambda] shows promise across 
          a broad range of doses and viral genotypes, and in difficult to treat 
          host genotypes." 
        Investigator 
          affiliations: Duke University, Durham, NC; Alamo Medical Research, San 
          Antonio, TX; The Liver Institute, Dallas, TX; University of Utah, Salt 
          Lake City, UT; Liver and Intestinal Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, 
          Canada; University of Colorado, Aurora, CO; New York Hospital, New York, 
          NY; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT; ZymoGenetics, Inc., Seattle, 
          WA; Fundacion de Investigacion de Diego, Santurce, Puerto Rico. 
        12/10/10
        Reference
          AJ Muir, E Lawitz, RH Ghalib, and others. Pegylated Interferon Lambda 
          (PEG-IFN-?) Phase 2 Dose-Ranging, Active-Controlled Study in Combination 
          with Ribavirin (RBV) for Treatment-Naive HCV Patients (Genotypes 1, 
          2, 3 or 4): Safety, Viral Response, and Impact of IL-28B Host Genotype. 
          61st Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver 
          Diseases (AASLD 2010). Boston, October 29-November 2, 2010. Abstract 
          821.
        Other 
          Source
          Bristol-Myers 
          Squibb. ZymoGenetics and Bristol-Myers Squibb to Present PEG-Interferon 
          Lambda Phase 2a Interim Clinical Trial Results at AASLD 2010. Press 
          release. October 1, 2010.