Over years 
          or decades, chronic hepatitis B virus 
          (HBV) infection can progress to advanced liver disease including 
          cirrhosis and hepatocellular 
          carcinoma. Compensated cirrhosis means the liver is heavily damaged 
          but can still carry out its normal functions; decompensated cirrhosis 
          occurs when the liver is no longer able to perform it critical functions.
        
        Antiviral 
          agents that suppress HBV can prevent or slow liver disease progression, 
          and people with decompensated cirrhosis therefore stand to benefit greatly 
          from effective treatment. But these drugs can cause side effects that 
          patients with severe illness may be unable to tolerate. 
          
          A.K. Singal from the University of Texas Medical Branch and R.J. Fontana 
          from the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor performed a systematic 
          review of English language medical literature published between 1995 
          and 2010, looking for studies that evaluated the effectiveness and safety 
          of oral antiviral agents for people with decompensated HBV cirrhosis 
          (defined as a CTP score > 7). Studies were graded for quality 
          on a scale of 0-10.
          
          The researchers identified 21 relevant studies with a quality score 
          > 5, including 13 looking at lamivudine 
          (Epivir-HBV), 3 looking at adefovir 
          (Hepsera) in lamivudine-resistant patients, and 5 looking at entecavir. 
          They extracted 1-year efficacy and safety data for patients treated 
          for more than 6 months, and calculated odds ratios (OR) for controlled 
          studies and pooled proportions for open studies. 
          
          Results
        
           
            |  | Pooled 
              data on 6 controlled studies showed that patients taking lamivudine 
              (n = 920) did better than control subjects (n = 1237) with regard 
              to: | 
           
            |  | 
                 
                  |  | Undetectable 
                    HBV DNA: OR 148; |   
                  |  | ALT 
                    normalization: OR 76; |   
                  |  | CTP 
                    score decrease of at least 2 points: OR 9.2; |   
                  |  | Development 
                    of hepatocellular carcinoma: OR 0.36; |   
                  |  | Liver 
                    transplantation: OR 0.33. |  | 
           
            |  | Patient 
              survival was similar, however, and 22% of lamivudine recipients 
              developed lamivudine resistance. | 
           
            |  | Patients 
              taking adefovir and those taking lamivudine had similar survival, 
              but adefovir recipients were much less likely to develop resistance 
              (1.5%). | 
           
            |  | Adefovir 
              potency was lower than that of lamivudine, however, with only 57% 
              of patients achieving undetectable HBV DNA and 67% achieving normal 
              ALT. | 
           
            |  | Entecavir 
              showed higher efficacy, similar to that of lamivudine, but with 
              0% resistance. | 
           
            |  | All 
              3 drugs were safe, without serious adverse events except for kidney 
              insufficiency in < 1% of patients (2 of 226) taking adefovir 
              in 1 study. | 
           
            |  | 1 
              small randomized clinical trial found that entecavir had better 
              efficacy than lamivudine with regard to undetectable HBV DNA (100% 
              vs 72%) at 1 year. | 
        
        Based on 
          these findings, the researchers concluded, "Oral agents are effective 
          and safe for treating decompensated HBV cirrhosis."
          
          "Lamivudine is limited by resistance at 1 year and adefovir is 
          limited by potency," they continued. "Entecavir has advantages 
          of potency without resistance in treatment-naive patients."
          
          The investigators acknowledged that comparative studies of newer potent 
          agents with low resistance -- for example entecavir vs tenofovir -- 
          are needed to determine optimal treatment for hepatitis B patients with 
          decompensated cirrhosis.
          
          A study 
          published earlier this year showed that entecavir improved liver 
          function in people with decompensated cirrhosis, and in October the 
          drug was approved 
          for this indication.
          
          Like adefovir, tenofovir carries a small risk of kidney toxicity, a 
          concern because many people with decompensated cirrhosis already have 
          some degree of kidney impairment. A study 
          presented at last year's AASLD meeting, however, showed that tenofovir 
          -- especially when combined with emtricitabine 
          (Emtriva) -- was effective and well-tolerated in this population. 
          Telbivudine 
          (Tyzeka) has also 
          demonstrated good results in hepatitis B patients with decompensated 
          liver disease.
          
          Investigator affiliations: Gastroenterology, University of Texas 
          Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University 
          of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 
          
          11/16/10
        Reference
          AK Singal and RJ Fontana. A systematic review of oral antiviral agents 
          in decompensated HBV cirrhosis. 61st Annual Meeting of the American 
          Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD 2010). Boston, October 
          29-November 2, 2010. Abstract 
          375.