Oral 
        Tenofovir for Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Appears Safe and Does Not Discourage 
        Safer Sex
        
        
          
           
            |  |  |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  | 
                 
                  | SUMMARY: 
                    HIV 
                    pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) using once-daily oral tenofovir 
                    appeared safe and did not increase the likelihood of risky 
                    sexual behavior among men who have sex with men in 3 U.S. 
                    cities, researchers reported in a late-breaker presentation 
                    at the XVIII International Conference on AIDS (AIDS 
                    2010) last week in Vienna. The study found no indication 
                    of significant safety issues including kidney problems or 
                    bone loss. None of the 7 men who became HIV infected during 
                    the 2-year follow-up period were taking tenofovir, but this 
                    analysis was not powered to determine effectiveness. |  |  |  | 
           
            |  |  |  |  |  | 
        
        
        By 
        Liz Highleyman
        
        
        Biomedical 
          approaches to HIV prevention have become a mainstay of the field in 
          recent years. As 
          previously reported, investigators with the CAPRISA study last week 
          presented the first evidence from a human trial indicating that a vaginal 
          microbicide containing tenofovir -- the nucleotide reverse transcriptase 
          inhibitor in the Viread, 
          Truvada (tenofovir/emtricitabine), 
          and Atripla (tenofovir/emtricitabine/efavirenz) 
          pills -- can lower women's risk of HIV infection by 39%.
        Later 
          in the week, another group of researchers presented data from a study 
          showing that tenofovir taken in pill form every day appears to be safe 
          and acceptable as pre-exposure prophylaxis against HIV infection -- 
          better known as PrEP -- and does not lead to "behavioral disinhibition," 
          or increased propensity to engage in risky sex.
        Lisa Grohskopf 
          from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and colleagues 
          conducted a randomized double-blind trial (CDC-4323) to evaluate the 
          clinical and behavioral safety of once-daily oral tenofovir among men 
          who have sex with men (MSM) in Atlanta, Boston, and San Francisco.
        Between 
          February 2005 and July 2007, the study enrolled 400 initially HIV negative 
          men who reported having anal sex with another man during the past year. 
          Participants -- allocated into 4 study arms of 100 men each -- were 
          randomly assigned to take either 300 mg oral tenofovir or placebo once-daily, 
          starting either at the time of enrollment (and continuing for 4 years) 
          or after a 9 month delay (and continuing for 15 months); 373 participants 
          actually began their assigned treatment.
          
          The participants had an average age of 39 years. Most (about 75%) were 
          white, 15% were African-American (more in the placebo arm), 9% were 
          Hispanic, and 4% were Asian/Pacific Islanders. On average, they had 
          4 male sexual partners in the past 3 months; about one-third in both 
          arms reported unprotected sex during the same period and about 13% said 
          they had high-risk sex (for example, unprotected sex with a partner 
          known to be HIV positive).
          
          Participants had quarterly study visits that included HIV testing, risk-reduction 
          counseling, and assessment of adherence, acceptability, and biomedical 
          and behavioral safety. 
          
          Researchers measured laboratory biomarkers of kidney function and bone 
          health (creatinine and phosphate levels), and the San Francisco sites 
          also assessed bone density using DEXA scans, since kidney impairment 
          and bone loss are potential toxicities associated with tenofovir in 
          some studies.
          
          Results 
          
        
           
            |  | 323 
              men completed the study, for a retention rate of 86%. | 
           
            |  | 7 
              participants became HIV positive during follow up: | 
           
            |  | 
                 
                  | - | 4 
                    placebo recipients (including 1 who tested HIV negative at 
                    enrollment but was later found to have had acute infection 
                    in the "window period" before the test can measure 
                    enough antibodies); |   
                  | - | 3 
                    in the delayed treatment arm who seroconverted before starting 
                    tenofovir or placebo. |  | 
           
            |  | The 
              most common adverse events were diarrhea, back pain, headache, and 
              depression; only back pain was significantly more common in the 
              tenofovir group (13% vs 6%). | 
           
            |  | Similar 
              proportions of men in both groups (about 10%) experienced moderate 
              or severe (grade 3-4) clinical events or laboratory abnormalities. | 
           
            |  | 27 
              serious adverse events occurred, 16 in the tenofovir group and 11 
              in the placebo group (not a statistically significant difference). | 
           
            |  | Participants 
              in both arms did not experience significant increases in creatinine 
              from the baseline level, and no cases of grade 3-4 creatinine elevation 
              were observed. | 
           
            |  | No 
              participants in the tenofovir group and about 3% in the placebo 
              group developed serious hypophosphatemia, or low blood phosphate 
              level (a possible sign of bone loss), but the difference did not 
              reach significance. | 
           
            |  | Among 
              the San Francisco participants who underwent DEXA scans, about 4% 
              of men taking tenofovir and 2% taking placebo experienced a decrease 
              of more than 5% in hip or spine bone density, but again the difference 
              again was not significant. | 
           
            |  | Reported 
              sexual risk behavior did not change significantly in either arm 
              during the trial. | 
        
        Based 
          on these findings, the investigators concluded, "No significant 
          biomedical safety issues were identified."
          
          Importantly, this analysis was not designed to evaluate the effectiveness 
          of tenofovir PrEP -- larger studies are underway for that purpose -- 
          but oral tenofovir has been shown to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition 
          in studies of monkeys. While none of the 7 men who became infected in 
          this trial were taking tenofovir, the numbers were small enough that 
          this outcome could have been due to chance.
          
          The earliest (and furthest along) PrEP trials are studying tenofovir 
          alone, while more recent trials are looking at the combination of tenofovir 
          plus emtricitabine (Emtriva, 
          also in the Truvada and Atripla coformulations), which appeared 
          more effective than tenofovir monotherapy in animal studies. The first 
          efficacy data is expected as soon as the end of this year.
          
          Investigator affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 
          Atlanta, GA; Northrop Grumman, Inc., Atlanta, GA; Fenway Community Health, 
          Boston, MA; San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, 
          CA; AIDS Research Consortium of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.
          
          7/30/10
        Reference
          L 
          Grohskopf, R Gvetadze, S Pathak, and others. Preliminary analysis of 
          biomedical data from the phase II clinical safety trial of tenofovir 
          disoproxil fumarate (TDF) for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) 
          among U.S. men who have sex with men (MSM). XVIII International AIDS 
          Conference (AIDS 2010). Vienna, July 18-23, 2010. Abstract FRLBC102.